5 Comments
User's avatar
Thomas's avatar

Nice, I tried. LN to USDT worked fine. I gave up on the other direction after 5 tries. I got insufficient funds all the time. I think the UI needs to be improved. It's hard to guess the maximum sats to enter into the invoice. I want a "max" button to click and be able to provide an invoice without amount. Hard to understand the fees in the UI.

Boltz's avatar

That's awesome feedback, precisely what we are looking for as part of launching this in Beta. Working on it 🫡

> provide an invoice without amount

That's the only thing we can't do. Reason: https://support.boltz.exchange/hc/center/articles/1745247555-why-can-t-i-use-lightning-invoices-without-amount-zero-amount-with-boltz

Thomas's avatar

I didn't think it would support bolt12 but again nice surprise! I now tried a bolt12 as well but failed again. I realized it required more ETH for gas on Optimism. It said "not enough funds" - a bit cryptic. I actually already had enough for one transaction. The earlier transfer from LN->Optimism took a few seconds but now from Op->LN, it got stuck in layer zero bridging for 14 minutes? Why the difference? Well, I got back my sats eventually minus fee (1 USD?).

So, is it trustless and atomic? Probably, but how can I know? For example, on the EVM side, I send USDT to an unknown address. Can I trust it? Maybe the user interface should be more assuring in some way, more info maybe about what happens below the surface. Can I be fooled by a hacked user interface?

Abner's avatar

Finally. I've always thought tBTC was a better idea than wBTC, and seeing it integrated in a useful way to lightning is amazing

Boltz's avatar

Absolutely! Finally, anyone can mint and unmint! Today WBTC still has the network effect and liquidity, but things are changing.